Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
The question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff is barred from proceeding with the present suit for disability benefits under insurance policies because of a judgment in a former litigation between the same parties on the same policies. The court below ruled that the plaintiff was not barred.
Plaintiff, describing himself as “proprietor of bakery”, was insured by the defendant company on January 21, 1927, by two of its policies, identical in terms. By each policy $5,000 was payable to the insured’s designated beneficiary, but in double the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. PutnamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Aland v. P-G Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. BunchMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. PooleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Dunlap v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Armour v. Concord Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1979