Legal Opinion

Piso v. Weirton Steel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 393PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellee, an industrial painter, sustained severe injuries as the result of an accident caused by appellant’s negligence and was awarded a verdict of $900,000. Appellant urges that we reverse and order a new trial; in the alternative, appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to mold the verdict and to order that the additional defendant indemnify the appellant.

On May 20, 1971, appellee Gary Piso (“Piso”) filed a complaint in trespass against appellant, Weirton Steel Company, a division of National Steel Corporation, (“Weirton”). On June 8, 1971, Weirton…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Lambert v. PBI INDUSTRIESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Long v. 130 MKT. ST. GIFT & NOVELTY, ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Fahringer v. RinehimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Menna v. St. Agnes Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API