Church Budget Envelope Co. v. Cornell
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By FESS, J.
Appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court finding that the decision of the Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Compensation is supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law, and affirming the order of such Administrator.
Prior to December 3, 1948, two partnerships were engaged in business composed of different individuals. The Church Budget Envelope Co., referred to herein as partnership “A,” was organized in 1917 and engaged in the printing and sale of church collection envelopes. The Budget Press, referred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andres v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1900
- Lobato v. PaulinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Thurston v. Detroit Asphalt & Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Canada Dry Bottling Co. v. Board of Review, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Chisholm v. Chisholm Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karadanis v. SourwineNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Fairway Development Co. v. Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966