Legal Opinion

Karadanis v. Sourwine

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1989No. 19074PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.:

This is an attorney malpractice case. The trial court granted summary judgment to the respondent attorneys, ruling that the attorneys could not be held liable for their failure to prosecute in favor of their clients the defense of immunity under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act (NIIA) because the clients did not, as a matter of law, enjoy such immunity under the facts of this case.

One Larry Newcomb sued Karadanis and Maloff, doing business as Sundowner Casino, for negligence in their capacity as proprietors of the Sundowner Hotel and Casino, where Newcomb…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Frith v. Harrah South Shore Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Toenberg v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Monson v. ArcandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Richard Matthews, Jr., Inc. v. VaughnNevada Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Action Equipment & Scaffold Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Evans v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Harris v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Brebaugh v. HalesWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Brebaugh v. HalesWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API