Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Chisholm Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 41,401PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Appellant National Casualty Company was the insurer of Chisholm Construction Company under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8407 et seq. [Stat. Ann. §17.141 et seq.]). Chisholm Construction Company, one of the defendants, was a copartnership in which Archie Chisholm, plaintiff, was a copartner with his brother John Chisholm, who died before the hearing of the case. Premiums paid to appellant were based upon the payroll of the copartnership, which included the salary of $200 a month paid to plaintiff as managing partner. John Chisholm, the other partner, took no active part…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Thomson v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Lobato v. PaulinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Scott v. Alsar CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Western Transmission Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  5. Fuchs v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API