Legal Opinion

Kralick v. Shuttleworth

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1930No. 5421PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

This is an action for damages for seduction. The complaint alleges that plaintiff, at the time of the offense complained of, was and now is a single woman of the age of twenty-one years; that on the twenty-third day of July, 1927, at Idaho Falls, Idaho, the defendant, with force and by flattery, false promises, artifice and urgent importunity based upon professions of attachment, made an inde cent assault upon plaintiff, and then and there seduced, debauched and carnally knew her; that by reason of said seduction she has been humiliated and distressed and has suffered great bodily and mental…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ferguson v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sheahan v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Fry v. LeslieSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Greco v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API