Legal Opinion
Congrove v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 15, 1978No. 76-CV-547-W-4PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*504OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
On January 27, 1978, plaintiff filed with the Court his Notice of Deposition Upon Oral Examination, wherein he noticed up the deposition of Dr. V. W. Hollo, M.D., for Thursday, February 16,1978. On February 9,1978, defendant filed its Motion to Quash and for Protective Order, asking, inter alia, that this Court quash the subpoena served on Dr. Hollo. On February 10, 1978, plaintiff filed his Response in Opposition thereto.
While many issues were raised in defendant’s February…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grinnell Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Estes Park v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Frantz v. GolebiewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Turgut v. LevineCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.