Legal Opinion

Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Estes Park v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1984No. 82SA28PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Town of Estes Park (“Estes Park,” or “town”) from the judgment of the water judge for water division 1 denying the town’s application for approval of a plan for augmentation. The trial court based its rejection of the plan on the conclusion that the water relied on by the town for augmentation use is not available for that purpose. Objector 1 Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“district”) cross-appealed from that portion of the judgment assessing $353.35 against the district as a fee for taking the deposition of W.W. Wheeler, an engineering…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Kurz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Nelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  5. Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Co. v. McCloughanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson v. Central Bank Denver, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API