Legal Opinion
Larned v. Briscoe
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to superior' court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Trespass. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The plaintiff brought an action of trespass against the defendants.
The close is described in the declaration as—
“Lot No. 14 of the ‘ George B. Porter farm,’ so called, in the city of Detroit, Wayne county, Michigan, said lot being-situated on the north-east corner of Woodbridge and Twenty-fourth streets, in said city, and having a frontage of, to wit,. 133 feet on Woodbridge street, and 250 feet on Twenty-fourth street, said lot extending to the middle of each of said streets,, subject to the public easement for a highway.”
The trespass complained of consisted of removing the soil of said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William H. Tracy and John B. Balestier, in Error v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Tearney v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Brown, Hussey & Erith v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Buskirk v. StricklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Smith v. ColbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wallenberg v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Township of North Star v. CowdryMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Dean v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Cummings v. DixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- West Virginia Coal Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.