Legal Opinion

West Virginia Coal Co. v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages sought to be recovered on the ground that defendant city breached a contract made with plaintiff, for the purchase of 15,000 tons of coal screenings at $6.50 per ton, for the city waterworks. The cause was tried to the court and judgment went in favor of defendant. The plaintiff submitted its case upon an agreed statement of facts, and then defendant's offered demurrer being denied, the city submitted its defense upon an additional agreed statement of facts. These statements were taken subject to objections as to their competency, respectively reserved and made…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Aurora Water Co. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Boone County v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Lamar Township v. City of LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Board of Public Works of Rolla v. Sho-Me Power Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Layne-Western Co. v. Buchanan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Kennedy v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API