Buskirk v. Strickland
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Genesee. Trespass. Defendants brine- error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Strickland sued Buskirk and Rudolph in trespass for digging and removing gravel from her premises in the village of Fenton. The important facts of the controversy as they are presented by the record are the following :
The village of Fenton was platted by the proprietors of the land and the plat recorded in the year 1837. Upon the plat was block 37, which was sold and by successive mesne conveyances has passed to Strickland, who occupied it as a dwelling lot when the alleged trespass took place. The block is bounded on the north by Shiawassee avenue and on the east by George street. Strickland…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Percival v. HickeyNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- Field v. Village of ManchesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Board of Supervisors v. BanksMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Kilts v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.