Legal Opinion

Dean v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1904No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw, Lockwood, J., presiding. Bill by Sedgwick Dean and Henry S. Dean against the Ann Arbor Railroad Company, the city of Ann Arbor, and others to restrain the obstruction of a certain street. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

A reference to the plat and a reading of the opinion filed by the circuit judge will give an understanding of the questions involved in this case. The opinion reads:

“ The bill in this case is filed to enjoin the Ann Arbor Railroad Company and the city of Ann Arbor and its officers from building an embankment in and across First street, in the city of Ann Arbor, and from closing or. diverting First street, and for.a decree compelling the defendants to keep First street from Williams street to Liberty street in good repair and in a condition reasonably safe for public travel. A long time prior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of Detroit v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. People ex rel. Bristol v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Phelps v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Ranson v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Sandstrom v. Oregon-washington Ry. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API