Legal Opinion

Battle v. . Mayo

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff Battle, under an order in a supplementary proceeding against the defendant James M. Mayo instituted by T. P. Braswell Co., judgment creditors of said Mayo, was appointed receiver on 7 January, 1887, after judgment creditors of Mayo had been made parties to that proceeding.

The plaintiff alleges in the complaint:

1. That on 14 January, 1886, the defendants, A. H. Ricks and A. L. Taylor, executed three sealed notes to Carr Bros. Co., each for the sum of five hundred dollars, with interest from date at eight per cent, payable, respectively, 1 September, 1886, 1 November, 1886, and 1…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Heilig and Others v. . Stokes and PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  3. Means v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Coates Bros. v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Nye v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
  5. Lackett v. RumbaughU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API