Lackett v. Rumbaugh
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina
At Law. This is an action at law in which a controversy has arisen between the plaintiffs and persons who have been allowed to interplead and set up title to a fund brought into the custody of the court by attachment proceedings instituted by the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtDick, J.
The counsel of the parties have waived a trial by jury and submitted all questions of fact to trial by the court. In performing this duty I will con form as near as I can to the principles of law and the rules of practice which have been announced by the state and federal *24supreme courts in the cases Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U. S. 192, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 57; Battle v. Mayo, 102 N. C. 413, 9 S. E. Rep. 384. The counsel on both sides have submitted arguments and briefs presenting statements of facts which they deem established by the evidence, and their views upon the questions of law…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Mining Association v. Mine Safety And Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. ScullyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1937
- Gay v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Hill 282429 v. Maricopa, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- In re: Michael Alexander Gonzalez Maldonado and Angelica Canales Vazquez v. Banco Popular de Puerto RicoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.