Nye v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GORDON, Chief Judge.
This action is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have stipulated to all material facts, which stipulations constitute the Court’s Findings of Fact.
I
JURISDICTIONAL FACTS
1. The plaintiffs in the above-styled action are Charles B. and Mary Jane Nye, who reside as husband and wife in the City and County of Durham, North. Carolina.
2. The defendant is the United States of America.
3. This action is brought by the plaintiffs for the refund of federal income taxes.
4. Plaintiffs timely filed Joint United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- W. B. Rushing v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Battle v. MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pityo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Bowen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Paul G. Lustgarten and Jacqueline Lustgarten v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Vaughn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Shelton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.