Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boedigheimer v. Welter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 1940No. 32,516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

On the petition of Hugo Boedigheimer, a writ of quo warranto issued out of the district court of Otter Tail county requiring respondent, William L. Welter, to show by what authority he assumed to exercise jurisdiction as municipal judge of the village of Perham. On the pleadings the trial court ordered the writ vacated and the proceedings dismissed. This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to that order.

The municipal court in question was established by Ex. Sess. L. 1933-1934, c. 35. Section 2 thereof reads:

“Said Court shall possess all the powers and, except…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saari v. GleasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Nordin v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Childs v. HolmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Jack v. SchmahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Knappen v. CloughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bysiewicz v. DinardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. In Re Candidacy of DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Pavlak v. GroweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Elbers v. GroweCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Bysiewicz v. DinardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API