Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Knappen v. Clough

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Isanti county, Vanderburgh, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The action is in the nature of quo warranto to oust defendant from the office of county attorney of Isanti county, to which he was elected, on the ground of his ineligibility to the office. The only ground of ineligibility alleged is that he is not an attorney and counsellor at law, nor has ever been admitted to practice as such in any of the courts of the state. Section 7, art. 7, of the constitution provides that “ every person who, by the provisions of this article, shall be entitled to vote at any election, shall be eligible to any office which now is, or hereafter shall be, elective by…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Summerfield v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State ex rel. Kinsella v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Nordin v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Childs v. HolmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Hoffman v. DownsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API