Legal Opinion
Choi v. Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 8, 1999No. 1:99-cv-10687PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION
LASKER, District Judge.
In Sup Choi, M.D., asserts three claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (“ERISA”), against Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Inc., Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan II, The MGH Professional Staff Severance Plan and Massachusetts General Hospital, (collectively “MGH”). MGH moves to dismiss Count II, which alleges that MGH discriminated against Dr. Choi in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1140, ERISA § 510, by rescinding its initial recommendation to grant an incentive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Julia Rogers v. Leroy LoetherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Iwata v. Intel Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Radford Trust v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005