Legal Opinion
Haskins v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided November 10, 2014No. AC 13-P-506PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
We are called upon to address a question raised but not resolved in U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Schumacher, 467 Mass. 421 (2014) (Schumacher): whether a notice of a mortgagor’s right to cure a mortgage loan default, sent pursuant to G. L. c. 244, § 35A, is deficient if it is sent by the mortgage servicing agent (rather than the record holder of the mortgage), or if it identifies the servicing agent as the mortgage holder. We conclude that the notice in the present case complied with the statute, and affirm the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. 3
Background. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of NebrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Santos v. U.S Bank National AssociationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Bulmer v. MidFirst Bank, FSADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Sullivan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Gold Star Homes, LLC v. DarbouzeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.