Legal Opinion

Rogue River Trailer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 7, 1966No. Civ. No. 65-341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOLOMON, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff manufactures campers resembling house trailers which are carried in the beds of pickup trucks. Because the Internal Revenue Service considered campers to be truck bodies taxable under § 4061(a) (1) and (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 4061(a) (1) and (2), plaintiff between *273April 1, 1960, and September 30, 1964, was required to pay manufacturer’s excise taxes totaling $144,261.41 on the sale of campers.

On April 29, 1964, the Court in King Trailer Co. v. United States, 228 F.Supp. 1013 (S.D.Cal.1964), held that campers were not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrew Jergens Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. King Trailer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. King Trailer Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
  4. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. United States v. H. T. Poindexter & Sons Merchandise Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tenneco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. Travel Industries of Kansas, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Riviera Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
  4. The Anderson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. The Anderson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API