Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Anderson Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 27, 1971No. 18281_1Published

1DissentPell, Circuit Judge

In holding that there was no combination sale in the transactions here involved, both the district court and this court find their main support for such result in the fact that the non-taxable items were distributed simply for the promotion of the company’s product. In other words, the cabinets and stands were advertising material distributed without charge.

This rationale appears to ignore the fact, which apparently was not in dispute, that included among the items originally received by the ultimate purchaser was a Tel-Tale Wiper Arm Pressure Indicator ostensibly having a regular retail…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilton M. Etheridge and Herman Savage, T/a Starlite Restaurant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Rogue River Trailer Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
  3. Vernie Loren West D/B/A West Coach Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API