Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 28, 1988No. 160, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

In Harden v. Mass Transit Adm., 277 Md. 399, 354 A.2d 817 (1976), this Court held that, under the pertinent provisions of the Maryland Insurance Code and the Maryland Vehicle Law, now codified in Code (1957, 1986 Repl.Vol.), Art. 48A, §§ 539 through 546, and Code (1977, 1987 Repl. Vol., 1988 Supp.), §§ 17-101 through 17-110 of the Transportation Article, the State of Maryland was not required to provide “no fault” Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits for persons occupying or injured by state motor vehicles, and that a motor vehicle liability insurance policy covering…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API