Legal Opinion

Ex Parte James Harnage

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 15, 2009No. 10-08-00415-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00415-CR

Ex parte James Harnage

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-071-CR

MEMORANDUM Opinion

James Harnage contends that the trial court should have dismissed the charges against him because he was not brought to trial within the time limits set by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. We will affirm the order denying his pretrial habeas application.

Harnage was an inmate in the Alabama prison system when he mailed a motion for final disposition of untried indictments, informations or complaints to the Freestone County…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. LincolnColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. Richard Frederick DixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API