State v. Hermerding
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
Defendant appeals from his ccnvictions for possession of a narcotic drug (K.S.A. 65-4127a) and marijuana (K.S.A. 65-4127b[a][3]).
Recitation of the evidence is unnecessary except as incident to our discussion of the two issues raised on appeal.
The first issue concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction for possession of a narcotic drug. Defendant contends the trial court erred in holding and instructing the jury that cocaine is a narcotic drug. Insofar as we are here concerned, the statutory definition of a “narcotic drug” is as follows;
“ ‘Narcotic drug’ means…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Juan G. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Quigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012