Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. City of Beaufort

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1988No. 1202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In 1986 the City of Beaufort adopted an ordinance which extended its boundaries to include two lots of land located on Lady’s Island. In this declaratory judgment action the appellants, T. Gaillard Pinckney, Sr. and Beaufort County, seek a determination that the annexation proceedings are void. The trial court ruled the annexation valid. We affirm.

Lady’s Island is located to the east of the City of Beaufort. The Beaufort River and its tidal arm, Factory Creek, separate the two land masses. Homer Hungerford agreed with the City of Beaufort that he would build a hotel and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bryant v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Ocean Beach Heights, Inc. v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Richardson v. RegisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Tovey v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. County of Darlington v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anne Arundel County v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. St. Andrews Public Service District v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Sonoco Products Co. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Felts v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Ballenger v. City of InmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API