Ocean Beach Heights, Inc. v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
The question is whether for the payment of its outstanding bonds the respondent town may tax petitioners’ lands which, without statutory authority, were included by boundaries defined in proceedings for its incorporation. Petitioners’ contention is that the lands never were within the boundaries of the towns de jure or de facto and that therefore they are not subject to its taxing power.
The Florida statutes empower the male inhabitants of any hamlet, village or town “to establish for themselves a municipal government” (Compiled General Laws, 1927, § 2935) to be designated an incorporated town…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Merrill v. MonticelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Shapleigh v. San AngeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Speer v. Board of County Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Myron LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Kersh Lake Drainage District v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of PompanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Tovey v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Township of Genesee v. Genesee CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.