Legal Opinion

Page v. Podol

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1935No. Civ. 8939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

The defendant had judgment in an action brought by her former husband, Andrew J. Berry, to recover one-half of a deficiency in income tax paid by him after dissolution of the marriage on the profits of their dealings in property held by them in joint tenancy during the marriage relation. Plaintiff died since the trial and an appeal from the judgment is prosecuted by his executrix.

In the years 1927 and 1928 Dr. Berry and the defendant, his then wife, sold certain stock which had theretofore been acquired by their joint efforts and held by them as joint tenants. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fresno Investment Co. v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Huddleston v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. SparkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brandtjen & Kluge v. FincherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Diehl v. HanrahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Langford v. EckertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Pioneer Title Insurance v. GuttmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Batini v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API