Diehl v. Hanrahan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This appeal presents the question of priority between two assessment liens under the San Francisco Street Improvement Ordinance. It was stipulated that “ordinance No. 4720 (New Series), was enacted under the provisions of Section 33, Chapter II, Article VI of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco, which said Charter was ratified by a Vote of the said City and County of San Francisco on May 26, 1898, and approved by the Legislature of the State of California on January 26, 1899, and which Charter went into effect on January 8, 1900, and, with amendments thereafter enacted was in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- McMillan v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Conley v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Fresno Investment Co. v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Elbert, Ltd. v. Federated Etc. PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Elbert, Ltd. v. Federated Income PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.