Legal Opinion
Claudio v. Dean MacHine Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 1, 2001Published
1Opinion of the Court
786 A.2d 224 (2001)
Luis CLAUDIO and Sexta Claudia, IDV. and as H/W, Appellees,
v.
DEAN MACHINE COMPANY, INC., Burton Industries, American Steel Line, Inc., North American Brass, Inc., and Hannum Electric Company, Appellants.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 24, 2001.
Filed August 1, 2001.
Reargument Denied September 27, 2001.
Joseph V. Pinto, Philadelphia, for appellants.
John B. Day, Philadelphia, for appellees.
Before JOHNSON, STEVENS, and LALLY-GREEN, JJ.
LALLY-GREEN, J.
¶ 1 Appellant, Dean Machine, Inc. (DMI), appeals from the judgment entered September 19, 2000. We vacate the judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Carr v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Fanning v. AcroMed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.