Legal Opinion

High v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 2004No. 1-02-3809PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully

Plaintiff Shedrina High appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing her personal injury action against defendant Chicago Transit Authority pursuant to section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (the Act) (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West 2002)) on the ground that her notice under section 41 failed to state the place or location of the accident. Plaintiff contends on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing her complaint because (1) she complied with the Act’s requirement that she provide defendant a statement including the location of the accident that was the basis of her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Chandler v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Margolis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Puszkarska v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barrera v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Hemphill v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. State Oil Co. v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Barrera v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API