Legal Opinion

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 18, 1962PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Defendants in 418 antitrust treble-damage actions joined in three motions under Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S. C.A. to strike certain allegations from the complaints. My opinion dated July 11, 1962, 1 dealt with the first of these and describes the background of the litigation. This opinion deals with the remaining motions directed to allegations relating to criminal and civil injunctive suits brought by the Government in Philadelphia against many of these defendants, and other allegedly prejudicial evidentiary matter.

The motions should be considered in the context…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Control Data Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. Reiter's Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Christian Schmidt Brewing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  4. City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Commonwealth Edison Company v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API