Legal Opinion

County of Sonoma v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1987No. A034522PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SABRAW, J.

In ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, the superior court determined that Revenue and Taxation Code1 section 6353 does not exempt sales of geothermal steam from Sonoma County’s general retail sales tax. As a result, it ordered the Board of Equalization to commence collection of appropriate past and future taxes. We first hold that postjudgment amendment of section 6353 in 1986 was intended by the Legislature to make it clear that such sales are and have been exempt from local sales taxes under the statute. We then hold that the 1986 legislation may be applied…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pacific Lumber Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Humane Society of the United States v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API