State v. Orta
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHEA, J.
The defendant, Jorge Orta, has appealed from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of accessory to manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ SSa-SB1 and 53a-8 (a),2 for which the trial court imposed a sentence of incarceration of twelve years. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the verdict, (2) the court improperly charged the jury, thereby creating confusion on the element of intent, and (3) the court improperly charged the jury on the meaning of reasonable doubt. We affirm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. LemoineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. AsheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. HindsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.