Legal Opinion
AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac & Ugine
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 30, 2002No. C-1-98-690, C-1-98-804PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Special Master (doc. # 188) 1 (the “Hardy Recommendation”) and the Report and Recommended Decisions of Special Master Regarding Defendants’ and Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment (doc. # 201) (the “Martens Recommendation”).
I. THE RECOMMENDATIONS
The Hardy Recommendation and the Martens Recommendation lay out in great detail the facts of these cases. The Court will rely on those factual summaries and present only those facts necessary to its analysis.
The Hardy Recommendation addresses…
2Cases cited121 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Automotive Technologies International v. BMW of North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.