Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge.
This consolidated case pertains to various CIBA Vision Corporation (“CIBA”) patents for extended wear contact lenses. This dispute started with a declaratory-judgment action brought by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (“J & J”) against CIBA, seeking a declaration that five of CIBA’S United States Patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,760,100 (“'100 Patent”), 5,776,999 (“'999 Patent”), 5,789,461 (“'461 Patent”), 5,849,811 (“'811 Patent”) and 5,965,631 (“'631 Patent”) (“Nicolson patents”) are invalid and/or unenforceable, and…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. Ciba Vision Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010