Legal Opinion

Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine, Defendants-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 23, 2003No. 03-1074, 03-1075, 03-1085, 03-1086Published

1Opinion of the Court

344 F.3d 1234

AK STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SOLLAC and UGINE, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

No. 03-1074.

No. 03-1075.

No. 03-1085.

No. 03-1086.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 23, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David E. Schmit, Frost Brown Todd LLC, of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ann G. Robinson.

Steven P. Weihrouch, Oblon, Spivak, McCelland, Maier, & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Steven E. Lipman, Jean-Paul Lavalleye, Stephen G.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API