Legal Opinion
Whittington v. City of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided September 30, 2005No. 03-03-00496-CVPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
Our opinion and judgment issued on June 8, 2005, are withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted.
This is an appeal in a condemnation case. The trial court 1 granted partial summary judgment that the City of Austin (the “City”) had authority to condemn eight lots in downtown Austin owned by appellants, Harry M. Whittington and members of his family (the ‘Whitting-tons”). The issue of compensation was then tried to a jury, which awarded the Whittingtons $7.75 million for their prop erty. The Whittingtons appeal the trial court’s partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Austin v. Harry M. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Carrollton v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Bcca Appeal Group, Inc. v. City of Houston, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Villarreal v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.