Jury v. State, Dept. of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
60 P.3d 615 (2002)
114 Wash.App. 726
Matthew A. JURY, Respondent,
v.
STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Appellant.
James Richard Bourquin, Respondent,
v.
State of Washington, Department of Licensing, Appellant.
Nos. 20462-6-III, 20580-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.
December 26, 2002.
Timothy S. Hamill, Assistant Attorney General, Yakima, WA, for Appellant.
Albert A. Rinaldi, Jr., Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
SWEENEY, J.
Washington's implied consent law prescribes that a driver impliedly consents to take a breath or blood test as a condition of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cannon v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Medcalf v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Medcalf v. State, Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- People v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- City of Brookpark v. Rodojev, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Lynch v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSINGCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.