Legal Opinion

Stock Growers Nat. Bank of Cheyenne v. Crosby

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1929No. 1500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

Appellants brought this suit against respondent on a promissory note dated March 8, 1922, due four months after date, with interest and attorney fees. The note is set forth verbatim in the petition, was made to the Big Horn County Bank, and is alleged in the petition to have been duly endorsed and sold to the appellant before maturity. It is also alleged that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the note, and the petition prays for judgment for the face of the note and interest and attorney fees. The answer in the case, is according to the brief of respondents filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Light v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  4. O'Connor v. SlatterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Levey v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wyoming Inv. Co. v. Wax Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Edmonds v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Awes v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API