Legal Opinion

Callan v. Hample

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1925No. 5,661PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The complaint herein alleges that the plaintiff is an expert accountant who, during the years 1922 and 1923, performed services for the defendant at his special instance and request, of the reasonable value of $1,074, and, in connection therewith, incurred expenses, increasing the total to $1,086.50, and that no part thereof has been paid. The answer admits that plaintiff is an expert accountant and denies the remaining allegations of the complaint.

After answer, defendant made demand for a bill of particulars, which was furnished May 10, 1923, and shows the number of days plaintiff claims to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buhler v. LoftusMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Allen v. Tuscarora Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. De Celles v. CaseyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. First State Bank v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Frisnegger v. GibsonMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Eskestrand v. WunderMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sawyer v. Somers Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hardie v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API