Legal Opinion

Hardie v. Peterson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. 6,504PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action in conversion to recover the reasonable value of 954 feet of oil and gas well casing of the alleged value of $1,800. The cause was tried to the court sitting with a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the court sustained motions for nonsuit interposed by the several defendants and accordingly entered judgments of dismissal and for costs. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgments.

When the case was called for trial, the court, over objections by plaintiff, permitted the filing of amended answers on behalf of all defendants. This ruling is assigned as error by…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Wilson v. BlairMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Edquest v. Tripp & Dragstedt Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gohn v. Butte Hotel Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. LeCompte v. WardellMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re Cummings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API