Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Larsen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1922No. 4,947PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER LEIPER

prepared the opinion for the court.

• This action is brought for the purpose of recovering from the defendant upon two promissory notes which are set forth in the complaint. The complaint is in the usual form. Paragraph 2 of the answer is as follows: “Admits the execution of the notes described in the complaint.” Páragraph 3 of the answer is as follows:

“Further answering the defendant alleges, that on or about the time said notes were due plaintiff and defendant orally *407entered into an agreement in substance as follows: That the plaintiff would accept, and did…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Daniels v. Granite Bi-Metallic Con. Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Atlanta Railway & Power Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Grant v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Frisnegger v. GibsonMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Jeffrey v. TrouseMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. First State Bank v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API