Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pence v. Glacy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 02-0520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff, Vicki Pence, appeals the trial court’s determination that defendant, Stephen Glacy, M.D., was not liable for recording an invalid hen against her residence under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 33-420(A) (2000). For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Vicki Pence is a physician’s assistant who was hired by Dr. Stephan Glacy in August 1999. In October 1999, Pence was having marital problems with her husband, William Dean Johnson. Pence approached Glacy and requested a loan so that she could hire an attorney to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Spencer v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API