Legal Opinion

Lovering v. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 12, 1986No. 0712PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

Richard and Errol Lovering and E. C. M. and Adelaide Waller commenced these class actions to challenge the validity of a special assessment imposed on owners of property at Seabrook Island by the Seabrook Island Property Owners Association. The Loverings have refused to pay the special assessment. The Wallers paid the assessment under protest and seek a refund. The Wallers sued both the Association and the Seabrook Island Company, the developer of Sea-brook Island. The Company was sued on the theory that it controls the Association through majority control of the Association’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Creech v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Smith v. CorneliusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Snug Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. CurranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Manning v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. PelzerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Lovering v. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Fisher v. Shipyard Village Council of Co-Owners, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Waller ex rel. Seabrook Island Development v. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API