Kitchell Corporation v. Hermansen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
DONOFRIO, Judge.
This action was commenced by the appellant, Kitchell Corporation, to recover on a promissory note. The appellant received judgment against Arizona-Utah Investment Company, a limited partnership, and against the persons who were their assignors. The court ordered that appellant take nothing on its claim against Hermansen and Horwitz and Co., a corporation, and denied recovery against Hermansen and Horwitz individually. This appeal is from only that part of the judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Hermansen and Horwitz individually.
A note for commission earned by Mr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- William Gilligan Co. v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- McGee v. NeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. LehmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Receivables Finance Corporation v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Ristvedt v. NettumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Facit-Addo, Inc. v. Davis Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Union Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.