Legal Opinion

Kitchell Corporation v. Hermansen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 12, 1968No. 1 CA-CIV 712PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOFRIO, Judge.

This action was commenced by the appellant, Kitchell Corporation, to recover on a promissory note. The appellant received judgment against Arizona-Utah Investment Company, a limited partnership, and against the persons who were their assignors. The court ordered that appellant take nothing on its claim against Hermansen and Horwitz and Co., a corporation, and denied recovery against Hermansen and Horwitz individually. This appeal is from only that part of the judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Hermansen and Horwitz individually.

A note for commission earned by Mr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. William Gilligan Co. v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. McGee v. NeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. LehmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Receivables Finance Corporation v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  3. Ristvedt v. NettumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Facit-Addo, Inc. v. Davis Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Union Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API