Legal Opinion
Field v. Witt Tire Co. Of Atlanta, Ga., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 31, 1952No. 57, Docket 22447PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. We reject defendants’ contention that the evidence was not enough to support the verdict. The photograph showing. the oars on the west shoulder of the road, together with the absence of debris or tire-marks elsewhere, justified an inference that the north-hound truck had turned left across the center before it hit Field’s car. This sufficed to warrant the conclusion that Connecticut General Statute, § 2489 had been violated. 4 LeBlanc v. Grillo, 129 Conn. 378, 28 A.2d 127.
2. A witness for plaintiff testified lhat Flowers, the truck-driver, seemed sleepy after the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Massa v. NastriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Roland Electrical Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Leblanc v. GrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Thomas v. Cumberland Operating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- MALONE, ADMR. ETC. v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Smith v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.