Legal Opinion
Bailes v. Bailes
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 20, 1929No. 7 Div. 888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In the recent case of Smith v. Smith (Ala. Sup.) 120 So. 167, 1 it was ruled that a decree denying a petition to modify a final decree granting alimony was such final decree as would support an appeal. The merits of petitioner’s case were presented in the companion case brought here by appeal, ante, p. 177, 124 So. 214, with the result that the mandamus must be denied.
Mandamus denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
218 Ala. 701.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Bailes v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aiken v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Home Ins. Co. v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ex Parte SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938