Legal Opinion

Ackman v. Ohio Knife Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 19, 1984No. C-1-84-617PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

This matter came on for consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. 3), plaintiffs' memorandum in opposition (doc. 4), and defendant’s reply (doc. 5). For reasons that follow, we conclude that defendant’s motion to dismiss should be denied in its entirety with respect to Counts 1 and 3, and denied as regards plaintiff McQueary with respect to Count 2. The motion is granted with respect to the Count 2 claims of plaintiffs Testa, Ackman, and Martin.

Four plaintiffs joined in this action which involves three counts. Count 1 alleges that defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Henkel v. Educational Research Council of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hedrick v. Center for Comprehensive Alcoholism TreatmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Merkel v. Scovill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Targot Telemarketing ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Pater v. Health Care and Retirement Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. Baker v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. Foltzer v. Lodge & Shipley Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  5. Smith v. L.M. Berry & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API