Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Rouillard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1942No. 3299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiff is a mutual life insurance company duly licensed to transact business in this state. The defendants are the Insurance Commissioner and the State Treasurer.

Section 60 of chapter 275 of the Public Laws provides that every foreign life insurance company shall pay annually to the State Treasurer “a tax of two per cent upon the gross premiums received by it from residents of the state” during the year, “less payments to residents of this state on account of death losses paid within the year.” The term “gross premiums received by it” is defined by the succeeding section (originally…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. BurbankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. In re Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. State Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Stiehler v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API