Legal Opinion

Stiehler v. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1993No. 92-AA-1162Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Robert 0. Stiehler and L. Leonard Haeker (the consumers) have petitioned this court for review of orders of the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (the Commission) holding that the District’s gross receipts tax (GRT) allows public utilities to collect a “tax-on-tax” from their customers. The consumers contend that the plain language of the statute precludes any “tax-on-tax” effect. We affirm.

I

On June 12, 1991, the Council of the District of Columbia enacted the District of Columbia Gross Receipts and Toll Telecommunication Service Tax Emergency…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. State Tax Commission v. Quebedeaux ChevroletArizona Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API